This past week marked
the 4 year point of my Jack Jumper Ant desensitisation treatment. I travelled
to Hobart on the bus as usual, alternating between a cryptic crossword, the
passing scenery, and taking photos. Arrived at the hospital, went through the usual obs, had my jab, and proceeded to pass the next obligatory hour with my latest novel before being
allowed to leave. Not my
latest novel, as in the one I’ll someday write, I wish, just the latest one I’m
reading.
All was fine for
about half an hour, then my eyes started to itch, nothing particularly unusual
as I do have dry eyes. Put some drops in, kept reading, then it hit me.
Suddenly felt hot, which again is not necessarily anything out of the ordinary,
as those wonderful Big M moments still plague me fairly regularly after all
these years. But then I felt sick, really sick, so off to the bathroom I shuffled.
Nothing erupted, but then I saw myself in the mirror. Hmm, that’s not right, I
thought, looking rather red and blotchy and glassy eyed there.
I was promptly
tossed on the bed, not literally mind you, the staff were very concerned and
caring, stuffed with pills, hooked up to BP and ECG monitors, and consequently
checked for the rest of the afternoon until the head to toe rash and nausea had
subsided. Staff rang the bus company to reschedule my return trip, I made it
back valiantly on the late bus, drove home, had a bite to eat and crawled into
bed somewhat worse for wear.
After 23 visits,
about 35 jabs, and a live ant sting test thrown in to see how the treatment was
going, it took visit number 24 to bring me undone. Think I must’ve jinxed
myself by saying when I first got there “Yay, only a year to go.” It’s not
normal, but an adverse reaction can happen even at this stage of the treatment,
so now I have to go back in four weeks instead of my usual three months.
“Why is it so?”
we all wondered. No definitive answer arrived at, so we’ll see what happens in
four weeks. I’ll make sure I book the late bus back just in case.
Also got me
thinking about desensitisation in general, and my mind went back forty years to
a moment when my first son was only a few months old. Plastered across our
television screens on every channel was the plight of a famine of biblical proportions in one of
the African nations. Emaciated people, vacant eyes in bodies barely alive,
children with swollen bellies, mothers cradling their dying babies as they sat
in the dirt powerless to change the fate that awaited them.
My husband
wondered where I’d gone. He found me out in the laundry, washing nappies, tears
streaming down my face. I’d seen such scenes before, but somehow, the life of
my own baby who I knew was safe and secure and in no danger of starving
triggered something much deeper within. I could no longer be a casual observer,
immune to the suffering of mothers on the other side of the world who knew
their babies had no hope of survival. And obviously not just the mothers and
their babies, but that was where the initial response kicked in.
We see it every
day on television, the playing out of natural disasters, wars, criminal
activity, domestic tragedies, industrial accidents, plane and train and car
wrecks. We receive hourly updates, the never ending litany of dramas unfold right
in front of us via social networks and every media source, and before you know
it we seem to reach our limit of being able to really care.
We become
desensitised. We are removed from the disaster, it doesn’t touch us personally,
and because we feel powerless to do anything about the problem anyway, we start
to switch off to the magnitude of it and the pleas for help. We suffer what has
become known as charity fatigue, and skirt around fundraising collectors in shopping centres and on street corners, eyes averted, pretending to be on a
mission of far greater importance. We become adept at avoiding the issue.
It took a hiccup
with my Jack Jumper treatment to remind me that the desensitisation process can
be very rudely interrupted, and I wondered what would have a similar effect on
the attitudes we hold towards those unfortunate enough to be the victims of catastrophes
we hope we will never have to face.
Much has been
written of late of Aylan Kurdi, the Syrian toddler who lost his life along with
his mother and brother, and whose lifeless body was washed up on the shore in
Turkey. The photos of his body on the beach and of the Turkish policeman
treating him with such care as he carried him away, felt like such an invasion
of privacy, but that was the hiccup, the wake up call. It was that image and
that moment which galvanised worldwide rage and horror and sentiment and public
opinion.
I would hate to
think anyone could be so desensitised to the suffering of others that such a
moment went unnoticed, that a life so precious could be regarded as a simple
statistic, collateral damage in the context of the bigger picture. Death in
such tragic circumstances seems so futile, and unfortunately we can easily forget
the human face as the tally of those lost rises in ever increasing numbers, but
to see one solitary child, washed up on the beach like a piece of flotsam, is
heartbreaking to say the least and makes the anger rise in me.
We want to jump
up and down, grab politicians, presidents, prime ministers and kings, despots
and dictators and gun wielding extremists by the scruff of the neck, shake them
and scream “Can’t you see? Can’t you see? Is this the sort of world you want?”
But this is the
world we have, like it or not, and for me to cope I have to bring it down to a
very personal level. I can’t deal with the thousands displaced around the
world, but I can go out of my way to
better educate myself about how I could help one person, one family. How to get
past the initial misgivings of venturing into the unknown territory of someone
else’s trauma and attempting to be part of them finding a more hopeful future.
There are
agencies and organisations right on our doorstep that would welcome such help
if we care to look. Barely a few weeks have passed since that harrowing image
gave us a reality check on the refugee crisis. Do I have the heart to make a
move to be part of the solution, or will I gravitate to the fallback position
of complacency. I wouldn’t regard myself as being insensitive to the needs of
others, but when it comes to the nitty gritty I wonder how much space I’m
prepared to give to others and the chaos they might bring.
Pretty
confronting really.
